Old-School Instrumentation (2024)

• Whit Posts: 4,191

  2013-06-13 08:51 edited 2013-06-13 08:51

  Sensory overload! Holy smokes!

• Publison Posts: 12,366

  2013-06-13 09:10 edited 2013-06-13 09:10

  A few more gauges than a Cessna.

• mindrobots Posts: 6,506

  2013-06-13 09:12 edited 2013-06-13 09:12

  REAL Old-School instrumentation - Sopwith Camel

  

  That part over there with the tachometer and oil pulsator would be used by the flight engineer......

  Camel_co*ckpit.jpg

  1024x640 - 107K

  Camel_co*ckpit.jpg 107.4K

  See Also

  Homemade Greek Yogurt Recipe | Quick Delicious Cheap - How to Make Greek Yogurt | Easy Homemade Greek YogurtWoman As A Pioneer – Legends of AmericaFluffy Homemade Buttermilk Pancakes (Grandma Barb's)world war II – What's Cookin' @ Special Collections?!

• Publison Posts: 12,366

  2013-06-13 09:17 edited 2013-06-13 09:17

  Convair = 6 piston engines
  Corvair = 6 pistons

• Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514

  2013-06-13 09:24 edited 2013-06-13 09:24

  'Not much of a windshirld in that B-36. How did they see what was in front of them -- or the ground to land?

  -Phil

• Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514

  2013-06-13 09:29 edited 2013-06-13 09:29

  Publison wrote:

  Convair = 6 piston engines
  Corvair = 6 pistons

  Corvette = a small, maneuverable, lightly armed warship, smaller than a frigate

  -Phil

• erco Posts: 20,254

  2013-06-13 09:49 edited 2013-06-13 09:49

  Can't recall if I shared this "Group Red" link previously, about the "garage queen" status of so many Corvairs. I've never added mine to the list, since I'm sure that "next month" I'll be getting back on the restoration project.

  http://www.wittelaw.com/personal/groupred/

• Hal Albach Posts: 747

  2013-06-13 09:53 edited 2013-06-13 09:53

  Looks like it took 4 people to fly this thing. Wonder how fast they all can get out. It looks like there might be an exit door behind and to the left of the pilot's seat and the overhead emergency. Anyone know of any other exits? Where's the restroom? (Or do they all have to "wear" It?)

• erco Posts: 20,254

  2013-06-13 10:00 edited 2013-06-13 10:00

  See Also

  The Wartime Kitchen: Living of Rations with Ration Book Cooking – Day Two & Lord Woolton Pie

  No peanuts or sodas on that plane, but they did hand out AOL CDs with 250 free hours.

• jones Posts: 281

  2013-06-13 13:06 edited 2013-06-13 13:06

  That type of instrumentation isn't quite as bad as it seems. All of those engine gauges are held in place with a sort of clamp and could be rotated. Often the gauges would be set at what seemed like odd, arbitrary angles but what they were really up to was for normal operation, to the extent possible all the needles pointed in the same direction. One glance would tell you if anything was amiss because you're just looking for a needle pointing different from the rest.

• potatohead Posts: 10,254

  2013-06-13 14:11 edited 2013-06-13 14:11

  Oh man! That is absolutely beautiful! Thanks a lot for linking it here. I gotta go share.

• erco Posts: 20,254

  2013-06-13 14:54 edited 2013-06-13 14:54

  mindrobots wrote: »

  REAL Old-School instrumentation - Sopwith Camel

  That part over there with the tachometer and oil pulsator would be used by the flight engineer......

  My favorite factoid about the Sopwith Camel was that most versions didn't even have a throttle. The pilot would blip a switch (ie, BIT-BANG) to kill ignition to reduce power for landing.

  The Gnome "mono" engines did not have throttles and were at full "throttle" while the ignition was on – they could be "throttled" with a selector switch which cut the ignition to some of the cylinders to reduce power for landing. The Clerget, Le Rhone and BR1 had throttles, although reducing power involved simultaneously adjusting the mixture and was not straightforward, so it became common during landing to "blip" the engine (turn the ignition off and on) using a control column-mounted ignition switch, the blip switch, to reduce power.

  from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sopwith_Camel

  Furthermore, since the SC fired bullets through the PROPELLER, the proper BAUD RATE and STOP BITS were required to synchronize with the machine gun.

• localroger Posts: 3,451

  2013-06-13 15:26 edited 2013-06-13 15:26

  My favorite thing about that instrument panel is that you are expected to operate all that equipment and keep it nominal while people in other airplanes are shooting at you.

• Genetix Posts: 1,744

  2013-06-13 18:40 edited 2013-06-13 18:40

  Since when do operators follow directions? Also in a combat situation people are going to do that things that were either never anticipated or push the limits of the design. Besides how often do you look at the instruments when you are driving your car?

• W9GFO Posts: 4,010

  2013-06-13 18:47 edited 2013-06-13 18:47

  erco wrote: »

  My favorite factoid about the Sopwith Camel was that most versions didn't even have a throttle. The pilot would blip a switch (ie, BIT-BANG) to kill ignition to reduce power for landing.

  The Gnome "mono" engines did not have throttles and were at full "throttle" while the ignition was on – they could be "throttled" with a selector switch which cut the ignition to some of the cylinders to reduce power for landing. The Clerget, Le Rhone and BR1 had throttles, although reducing power involved simultaneously adjusting the mixture and was not straightforward, so it became common during landing to "blip" the engine (turn the ignition off and on) using a control column-mounted ignition switch, the blip switch, to reduce power.

  from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sopwith_Camel

  Furthermore, since the SC fired bullets through the PROPELLER, the proper BAUD RATE and STOP BITS were required to synchronize with the machine gun.

  You forgot the single most interesting thing (IMO) about the Sopwith Camel, it used a rotary engine - that is the propeller was mounted directly to the engine and the crankshaft was bolted to the firewall. The gyroscopic forces from the spinning engine made for very quick turns to the right, slow turns to the left.

• erco Posts: 20,254

  2013-06-13 20:00 edited 2013-06-13 20:00

  Yes, those early rotary engines were amazing that way, cylinders rotating around a stationary crankshaft. But... not unique to the Sopwith Camel IIRC.

  My first job was at Pratt Whitney Aircraft Engines in West Palm Beach Florida. They had a long, proud heritage of their WASP radial (not rotary) engines, including this 28 cylinder, 56-sparkplug beast: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_R-4360

  Don't foul all 56 plugs on startup!

• ElectricAye Posts: 4,561

  2013-06-13 22:10 edited 2013-06-13 22:10

  Hal Albach wrote: »

  Looks like it took 4 people to fly this thing. Wonder how fast they all can get out. It looks like there might be an exit door behind and to the left of the pilot's seat and the overhead emergency. Anyone know of any other exits? Where's the restroom? (Or do they all have to "wear" It?)

  From wikipedia:

  "....The B-36 had a crew of 15. As in the B-29, the pressurized flight deck and crew compartment were linked to the rear compartment by a pressurized tunnel through the bomb bay. In the B-36, one rode through the tunnel on a wheeled trolley, by pulling oneself on a rope. The rear compartment featured six bunks and a dining galley, and led to the tail turret...."

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-36

  

Sign In or Register to comment.

Sign In Register